Passenger groups have given a cautious welcome to the biggest shake-up of rail fares in 40 years.
The vast array of ticket choices currently offered is to be scrapped and replaced by just three single and return tickets: Advance; Anytime; and Off-peak.
The aim of the changes by the Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc) is to make it easier to buy the best-value ticket for journeys.
The new structure will apply across all networks and Atoc claims that the vast majority of rail users will benefit from the changes. It said a "tiny, tiny, tiny" proportion would be worse off.
But Atoc has been criticised for using the change to scrap refunds for tickets and also for doubling the fee for changing journey times for return tickets bought in advance on many routes from £10 to £20.
The pricing structure has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s and Atoc said the change had been a "long- time coming".
The move, while welcomed in principle, was criticised by some passenger groups.
The Campaign for Better Transport called on the UK government to reduce the cost of rail fares, especially for last-minute journeys.
The campaign's executive director Stephen Joseph said: "Advance tickets are sometimes cheap, but people can't always plan their journeys weeks beforehand. The government must make train travel the cheap and easy option if we're going to reduce carbon emissions from transport."
Anthony Smith, chief executive of rail customer watchdog Passenger Focus, said: "Simplifying the range of fares is a big step in the right direction.
"Anything that hacks away at the current fares jungle will help."
Gerry Doherty, leader of the TSSA rail union, said: "This will hit the passengers who can least afford it - the young and the elderly who can only afford to travel by paying in advance.
"These changes are meant to make rail travel easier. They should not be used as an excuse to increase profits by scrapping refunds."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article