FORMER Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini has said the requirement for corroboration in Scottish criminal cases could be challenged at the European Court of Human Rights.
The Scottish Government has already proposed abolishing the historic rule which dictates that two separate sources of evidence are needed for a conviction.
Campaigners for sexual abuse victims have backed the plans amid concern that a considerable number of rape and attempted rape cases do not make it to court.
Dame Elish said: "My own view is that it will not be long before a victim in a case, which is marked 'no proceedings', will take the Scottish system to the European Court at Strasbourg.
"[And they will] say that because of this requirement, in sexual offending in particular, that they are unable to obtain effective criminal sanctions in Scotland."
Last month, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill backed the findings of the Lord Carloway review by publishing a bill to end the statutory need for corroboration in criminal trials.
At the time Liberal Democrat MP Sir Menzies Campbell, who practised as an advocate depute in Scotland's High Court, said the move was populism at its worst, warning: "Corroboration is an essential component of the presumption of innocence and a necessary bulwark against false accusation and injustice."
The Law Society of Scotland said: "The requirement for corroborated evidence is not an antiquated, outmoded legal notion but is a fundamental principle of our justice system."
But Rape Crisis Scotland welcomed the move, saying it would remove a barrier to cases getting to court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article