A STRUCK off solicitor's bid to sue a Scottish aristocrat for £4.25 million over the return of a stolen painting was "an attempt to extort money", a court has heard.
Marshall Ronald is seeking the payout from the Duke of Buccleuch following the recovery of the Leonardo Da Vinci masterpiece Madonna of the Yarnwinder.
Mr Ronald, who was cleared of criminal charges including conspiracy to extort money in 2010 in a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh, said he had acted in good faith and added: "I don't accept any illegal acts."
Mr Ronald, who is conducting his own case, told the Court of Session in Edinburgh: "Buyback is a lawful and commercial method of recovering paintings." Andrew Young QC, for the Duke, said: "Properly viewed, what the pursuer (Mr Ronald) is averring here is an attempt to extort a sum of money."
Mr Ronald, 57, of Upholland, Lancashire, wants his action to go to a hearing of evidence while lawyers acting for the Duke are seeking to have it dismissed.
The painting, worth an estimated £50 million, was stolen from Drumlanrig Castle, near Thornhill, in Dumfriesshire in 2003 and recovered four years later.
Mr Ronald claims that following discussions with an undercover police officer, John Craig, it was agreed he would be paid £4.25m for the return of the painting. However the Duke maintains there was no contract.
Lord Glennie reserved his decision in the case following the hearing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article