THE owner of a shellfish boat is facing jail after being found guilty of a series of safety failings that led to the death of a diver electro-fishing for razor clams in the Firth of Forth.
Father-of-two James Irvine drowned after getting into difficulties in Largo Bay, Fife, on March 24, 2011.
Mr Irvine, 42, an unemployed kitchen fitter whose only dive training had been a two-week holiday course in Turkey, had been recruited by 60-year-old Guthrie Melville, owner of the 26ft Solstice, based at Methil Docks.
The razor clams could be sold on at high prices for the tables of the Far East, and a day's catch could fetch Melville over £2,000.
The Solstice was thought to have been using an unapproved technique to make the razorfish rise to the surface of the sandy bottom by trailing unprotected copper electrodes connected to an electric welder.
An expert said the set-up posed a risk of serious injury - only a few milliamps could have stopped a diver's heart.
It is not known whether this happened to Mr Irvine, whose body was found lying face-up on the river bed by a police frogman. He was discovered with plenty of air left in his breathing tank, neither of his two air-supply regulators was in his mouth, and he had drowned.
Prosecutor Lousie Beattie said that once Mr Irvine got into difficulties, he was left "truly on his own", eight metres down in the Forth, because Melville had no second diver on standby to rescue him and no means of communicating with him or getting him from the water in an emergency.
He had also failed to ensure that Mr Irvine was wearing an inflatable jacket which he could have used to get to the surface quickly.
The only means anyone on the Solstice had of telling how he was getting on underwater was to look for bubbles coming up to the surface, and when they stopped, Melville and his only crewman, an elderly retired builder called Carl Smart, could only panic.
Melville, who had failed to complete a diver-training course he had been on himself, could not get his radio to work and had to phone the police to ask them to call the coastguard.
At the end of a five-day trial at Stirling Sheriff Court, jurors took just two hours to find Melville guilty, by a majority, of a string of breaches of diving at work and Health and Safety regulations.
Melville was also found guilty of putting five other divers at risk through similar failings over a six-year period between April 2005 and the date of the tragedy.
Melville, of Kirkburn Drive, Cardenden, Fife, had denied the offences. He did not give evidence, but his defence claimed that Mr Irvine had simply been diving for pleasure. He showed no emotion when the verdicts were announced.
Outside court, Mr Irvine's wife Hazel said Melville deserved prison.
She said: "We are just pleased with the guilty verdict and we really hope he goes to jail."
Mr Irvine's daughter Chloe, 18, said: "He failed to protect five other men, so if this hadn't happened to my dad, sooner or later it would have happened to someone else."
Mr Irvine's son Alan, 25, said: "The safety elements are really concerning and we just hope everything surrounding that stops.
"We just don't want to see what happened to our dad happen to anyone else."
The court heard earlier that Mr Irvine had been "dubious" and "apprehensive" before the fatal dive.
Mrs Irvine, 42, said her husband of 21 years told her that he would be paid between £100 and £150 a day, going down by himself, putting in rods, and bringing up razor clams.
He said the rods were similar to cattle prods, and would "give you a jolt", but not enough to do any damage.
A friend of Mr Irvine, Linda Morton, 49, told the court: "To be honest I was shocked he actually did it, but what you do when you're desperate for money."
Sheriff William Gilchrist deferred sentence for reports. The charges of which Melville was convicted carry possible a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment.
A charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice was dropped.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article