An investigation has been launched following claims a judge fell asleep in court, causing a child rape trial to be halted.
The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office confirmed it is looking into the allegation against Recorder Philip Cattan, who was presiding over a trial at Manchester Crown Court.
The complaint is that Recorder Cattan nodded off as a young alleged victim was giving evidence this week via video-link in the trial of John Quigley.
The judge stopped the trial following the allegation and it will now be re-listed.
A spokesman for the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said: "The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office is aware of the allegation that Recorder Philip Cattan fell asleep during a trial at Manchester Crown Court.
"The matter is being considered in accordance with the Judicial Conduct (Judicial and other office holders) Rules 2013."
In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service said: "The jury has been discharged in the trial of R v John Quigley at Manchester Crown Court following an issue that arose at court during the cross examination of the first complainant in the case.
"The trial will be relisted as soon as possible. The complainants and other witnesses have been kept informed."
Quigley, 49, of Avon Road, Burnage, Manchester, denies a number of sex offences including the rape of a child under 13.
Philip Cattan is a well-known barrister in the Manchester area and is member of the St Johns Buildings chambers in the city.
He has appeared in a number high profile cases and was defence barrister in one of the trials relating to the 2001 Oldham riots.
Mr Cattan sits in Manchester as a recorder, which is a part-time judge.
Judge Gabriel Hutton was disciplined in 2002 after he nodded off during a rape trial at Gloucester Crown Court, causing it to be abandoned.
The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said Mr Cattan will not be commenting.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article