FORMER News Of The World editor Andy Coulson has blamed lawyers for not telling him phone hacking was illegal in his court bid to avoid the harshest jail sentence.
Coulson, 46, faces up to two years in prison after he was found guilty last week of conspiring to intercept voicemails at the paper following a marathon trial at the Old Bailey, London.
In mitigation, his lawyer Timothy Langdale, QC, said: "Despite the seriousness, the facts of the case do not justify the maximum penalty."
He said it was clear from the trial Coulson was not alone in being ignorant of the fact phone hacking was illegal.
"There are some features of this sorry affair which must be mentioned because they are capable of having, we submit should have, a mitigating effect on any sentence.
"Perhaps the most salient factor of the evidence is that no one at the News Of The World or the newspaper industry at large in 2000/06 realised that interception of voicemail messages was illegal, in the sense of criminal."
He said the paper's own legal department, whom Coulson consulted frequently, never advised him it was a crime.
Mr Langdale said that after Coulson left the paper in 2007, he went on to be a "trustworthy and straightforward" director of communications for David Cameron, he said.
Prosecutor Andrew Edis, QC, disputed Mr Langdale's assertion that Coulson was unaware of the illegality of phone hacking, saying the evidence could not be clearer - he said Coulson knew from the summer of 2004, about the time he heard of the David Blunkett voicemail to Kimberly Quinn.
The lawyer said: "He knew at least from that date that it was a criminal offence."
The prosecution has also asked for £750,000 costs to be paid following the 139-day trial.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article