FORMER tabloid editor Andy Coulson "rubber-stamped" a payment to a royal source for a story, despite being warned by a colleague that being caught could end up with both parties in court, he told the phone hacking trial.
The ex-No 10 spin doctor said he "failed to address" his own suspicions about the reporter, who was asking for the cash to pay the source.
Mr Coulson also repeatedly denied allegations he was aware of phone-hacking techniques being used by some News of the World (NotW) employees, and rejected a claim he had bullied co-defendant and ex royal editor Clive Goodman.
The payment, disclosed in an email exchange between Goodman and Mr Coulson in 2003, relates to a "green book" of contacts for royal staff.
In the email, Mr Goodman said he wanted to obtain the book for the "standard fee" of £1,000 from a royal policeman but the money should be paid in cash - something he needed Mr Coulson to sign for. The court heard Mr Goodman wrote that getting caught making the payment meant the police officer "could end up on criminal charges, as could we".
Mr Coulson, who said earlier that Goodman was prone to exaggeration and creating "unnecessary drama", said he signed off the payment.
He said: "I don't remember the email, but I have read them and thought a lot about them (in preparation for the trial). I didn't believe Clive was paying policemen, I still don't believe it.
"I think what I did was failed to address it properly with him. But I didn't (address it), I rubber-stamped it."
Mr Coulson denies two counts of conspiring with Mr Goodman, 56, of Surrey, and others to commit misconduct in a public office. Mr Coulson, 46, of Charing, Kent, is also charged with conspiring to hack phones with ex NotW boss Rebekah Brooks and former managing editor Stuart Kuttner.
All seven defendants deny all charges against them. The trial at the Old Bailey continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article