AN independent inquiry has been demanded into allegations by police officers that a target-driven culture has forced them to carry out unethical and potentially illegal searches.
The revelations in The Herald about pressure on officers to "massage the figures" and participate in an "unethical culture" of stop-searches prompted the call for an investigation.
Tavish Scott of the Liberal Democrats said: "Our police work incredibly hard in hugely challenging circumstances. But officers know that their job needs to be far more than a box-ticking exercise. We need to get to the bottom of these serious allegations and an independent investigation is the way to do it. Officers need to have confidence they can report their concerns without fear of reprisals.
"We need to know where the pressure on officers is coming from. Ministers? The Chief Constable? I know that Holyrood's Justice Committee will want to look very closely indeed at these deeply concerning reports."
More than a dozen police officers have approached The Herald to express their concerns about issues such as pressure on divisions to meet specific targets and record "positive" stop-searches, which has led to some officers selecting people with alcohol outside off-licences and known methadone users leaving pharmacies.
Officers say some divisions now have league tables with those who conduct most stop-searches and catch most speeding motorists named at the top.
They claim such tables are used as "leverage" against those wanting promotion or career progression.
As a result, some frontline officers are conducting stop-searches without due cause and falsely recording "positives".
Labour justice spokesman Graeme Pearson, a former senior police officer who headed the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, also expressed grave concerns.
He said: "This insight into what is happening within the Police Scotland is extremely concerning and not what Scotland wants for a national police service.
"No doubt Mr [Cabinet Secretary for Justice Kenny] MacAskill will again steer clear of these matters claiming they reflect operational issues for the chief constable."
He added: "The truth is, however, policing should reflect the priorities set by the public as outlined by the Scottish Parliament.
"Thereafter Mr MacAskill should be busy ensuring the Police Authority play their part in delivering the service we seek rather than the one they would prefer. The absence of a real challenge to leadership in policing must change."
Margaret Mitchell, justice spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: "There have always been concerns that officers are being put under unnecessary pressure to meet targets and now it has been confirmed.
"These officers are brave to speak out but it's unacceptable that they cannot do so without the fear of losing their job.
"It's clear Police Scotland are driven by targets rather than the protection of the public, and concentrating on collecting fines to fill their coffers is no real alternative to tackling crime."
The concerns have already been raised with Chief Constable Sir Stephen House by the chairman of the Scottish Police Federation, Brian Docherty, who was promised that action would be taken if bad practice was identified.
Deputy Chief Constable Rose Fitzpatrick said such practices would not be acceptable, but she defended the use of performance targets on key priorities reflecting public concern.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article