A MURDERER "clammed up" at the mention of Elaine Doyle's name, a jury heard.
Witness Hugh Jones, 44, was being questioned about time he spent "on protection" in Barlinnie Prison, Glasgow, at the same time as killer Gavin McGuire.
Defence QC Donald Findlay asked Mr Jones if he could recall the man and Mr Jones replied: "Why would I?"
The lawyer continued: "One of Scotland's more notorious murderers, Gavin McGuire, one could say with confidence."
Mr Jones said: "No, I do not recall who you are talking about."
Mr Findlay said a conversation between Mr Jones and Mr McGuire - "who committed one of the most brutal murders in recent years in Scotland" - turned to the question of why the two men were in prison.
He suggested to Mr Jones: "You brought up Elaine Doyle's name in this conversation with this man Gavin McGuire and when you brought up Elaine Doyle's name, Mr McGuire, who had been speaking to you, clammed up and said nothing more and you thought that was, to say the least of it, odd."
Mr Jones replied: "How do you know what I think?"
John Docherty, 49, now of Dunoon, who is on trial for the murder of 16-year-old Elaine, has put forward a list of 41 possible suspects which, he claims, may include the real killer. Gavin McGuire and Hugh Jones are on the list.
When Mr Jones was asked if he had killed Ms Doyle, he told the trial: "No, don't be so daft."
The trial also heard Mr Jones claimed to have been at home before 10pm on June 1, 1986 - the night before Ms Doyle's naked body was found, just yards from her Greenock home.
But two schoolgirls told police in the days after the murder Mr Jones had told them he and other boys had spoken to Ms Doyle in Greenock town centre much later.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article