THE father of a Dunblane victim has hit out at attempts to use the tragedy as an excuse to routinely arm police.
Dr Mick North, whose five-year-old daughter Sophie was killed when Thomas Hamilton opened fire at the town's primary school, said Police Scotland Chief Constable Sir Stephen House was wrong for suggesting armed police could have helped prevent incidents like the 1996 massacre.
Dr North described the single police force's policy as retrograde. He also questioned what difference gun-toting police would have made to an incident that was over before officers arrived.
Dr North said: "I can't see how any armed police would have stopped Dunblane - not at all. We know that it took 15 minutes until any police officer arrived at the school, when the incident was all over in three minutes.
"I can't help but disagree with his decision."
Sophie — described by her father as "bright and beautiful" — was killed alongside 15 fellow pupils inside the school's gymnasium. Class teacher Gwen Mayor was also shot dead, before loner Hamilton turned the gun on himself.
At a meeting of Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Association on June 25, Sir Stephen was forced to defend his decision to arm officers across Scotland.
He cited both Dunblane and the 2010 Cumbria shootings as he argued officers should not have to spend "an extra 5,10,15, 20 minutes" arming themselves.
But Dr North is adamant neither atrocity would have been prevented by having armed police readily available. He said: "For Sir Stephen House to cite Dunblane as a cause behind the routine arming of police is wrong."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article