A former constable has been left in career limbo as Scotland's police watchdog delays an appeal against his dismissal.
Furious Peter Cullen has been forced to put his life on hold while he awaits an overdue independent hearing in to his future.
The career officer has barely worked since a struggle with a prisoner in Saltcoats police station in November 2011 led to allegations of serious assault.
Mr Cullen, who served nine years in the police, was cleared of criminal allegations against him in October 2012.
The officer admitted injuring the prisoner - when he was struck by a cell door - but said he was acting in self-defence. A jury, at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court, agreed.
But Mr Cullen was still dismissed from the force on the civil burden of proof - the balance of probabilities - and must now wait for the Scottish Police Authority to convene an independent tribunal to hear his appeal.
That tribunal should have been held by October 1 last year.
Seven months later, Mr Cullen is still waiting to get a date.
He said: "I feel I have been let down by the SPA, which is a shambles. I am in complete limbo and don't have any confidence in the system.
"I have suffered a great deal of anxiety waiting for this case and I am now on the verge of bankruptcy.
"I am unable to get another job with this hanging over me."
The SPA, despite being responsible for scrutinising Police Scotland and its 23,000 officers and staff, has a tiny legal department.
The Herald understands long-term sickness by one worker has contributed to the delays facing Mr Cullen.
Appeals tribunals against dismissal are very unusual. Mr Cullen has already exhausted internal appeals within Police Scotland but is entitled to an inquiry organised by SPA but carried out by independent people.
Insiders acknowledge such tribunals can take some time to arrange.
An official spokeswoman declined to comment on Mr Cullen's circumstances
She said: "Complaints and appeals are confidential and the SPA does not comment on individual cases.
"However, we are committed to ensuring all cases are considered in a timely manner.
"On occasion, due to unforeseen circumstances or due to the logistics involved in what may be a lengthy and time consuming process, we are unable to meet timelines.
"In these cases we will ensure the applicant is aware and seek to address delays as a matter of urgency."
Mr Cullen now lives in Glasgow. His local MSP, Labour's Johann Lamont, has been querying why his case is taking so long.
She said: "I am concerned that Mr Cullen has been left in this situation with no idea of when he will get access to the tribunal to which he is entitled. It's not clear why.
"If it is about resources rather than a fault with SPA systems shall raise with Justice Secretary Michael Matheson."
The Scottish Police Federation and other bodies have long complained about how long disciplinary proceedings can take against police officers.
As The Herald revealed earlier this year, the number of Scottish police officers taken off the front line while under investigation has jumped by half in a year.
A total 141 constables, sergeants and inspectors are currently on "restricted duties", two out of five of them because they are suspected of data protection offences. Another 13 officers were suspended.
Periods of suspension and restricted duty can last more than two years. Mr Cullen's disciplinary process, including the criminal investigation, has already last three and a half years. Police rules say an appeals tribunal must be heard within six months of final dismissal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article