A GERMAN football fan has been cleared of singing a song in support of a terrorist group at a Celtic match - after claiming he did not understand the lyrics.
Lucas Tussing, 20, also argued "The Boys of the Old Brigade" he chanted about was not the same IRA responsible for decades of atrocities.
Mr Tussing was arrested at a Celtic v Kilmarnock game in March 2014 after police saw him waving his arms about and singing "offensive" songs, including The Roll of Honour.
He denied breaching the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act and an alternative charge of threatening or abusive behaviour.
Claire McEvinney, prosecuting, said: "Police saw the accused singing constantly. For all the songs he was singing, he clearly knew the words and he accepts he knows such songs.
"It's within judicial knowledge that there's lots of politics within football, especially Celtic and Rangers. Both the songs are about a terrorist organisation and singing songs about terrorist organisations could cause someone upset, fear and alarm."
But Neal McShane, defending, said there was no evidence The Roll of Honour was about a terrorist organisation and the other song was "not about the same IRA which committed the atrocities".
Tussing, of Dusseldorf, told officers: "Everyone was doing it. I wouldn't have done it if I knew it was criminal."
Sheriff Shirley Foran described the "unhappy situation" of the court put in a position of making pronouncements on lyrics or parts of lyrics said in whole or in part.
She accepted the accused did not mean to commit a criminal act, and said: "I do not find anything threatening or abusive in Mr Tussing's behaviour.
"In respect of the first charge and in the absence of evidence, I have doubts of the likelihood of inciting public disorder and by virtue of these doubts I find Mr Tussing not guilty."
Outside court, Tussing said: "I didn't know what the words meant but everyone was singing them. In Germany this is no problem."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article