• Text size      
  • Send this article to a friend
  • Print this article

Judge: defence lawyers cost taxpayers too much

DEFENCE lawyers are costing the taxpayer thousands of pounds by turning their backs on rules intended to shorten trials, Scotland's top judge has claimed.

Lord Justice General Lord Gill was giving a ruling on behalf of seven judges asked to consider whether sections of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 breached human rights.

The case had been called "a collision between two legally protected values," said Lord Gill - the right to silence and quick trials.

The issue came to the Court of Criminal Appeal after a challenge by two people due to stand trial for serious fraud this year. They claimed a Glasgow sheriff's pre-trial ruling had infringed their right to silence.

Lord Gill said: "It is notorious that over the last 20 years the average length of trials on indictment has increased substantially." He said one reason for this was the defence "putting the Crown to the proof of every piece of evidence in the case".

The judges threw out the human rights appeal. Lord Gill said there was legitimate public interest in avoiding needless expense.

Contextual targeting label: 
Transport Tragedy

Commenting & Moderation

We moderate all comments on HeraldScotland on either a pre-moderated or post-moderated basis.
If you're a relatively new user then your comments will be reviewed before publication and if we know you well and trust you then your comments will be subject to moderation only if other users or the moderators believe you've broken the rules

Moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours. Please be patient if your posts are not approved instantly.