A SON who beheaded his mother and buried her dismembered body in a shallow grave wants to be moved from a psychiatric hospital to a prison cell.
James Dunleavy, 40, was found guilty earlier this year of killing his mother after she came to visit him in Edinburgh last April.
His trial heard evidence that Philomena Dunleavy, 66, from Dublin, may have been alive when he began to hack off her legs with a knife and saw in his Balgreen Road flat.
Mrs Dunleavy's remains were found weeks later, buried on Corstorphine Hill. The mother-of-five was only identified after experts recreated a likeness of her from CT scans of her skull.
Labourer Dunleavy, who worked on Edinburgh's trams project, denied murder and attempting to defeat the ends of justice by burying her to try to cover up the crime.
A jury at the High Court in Edinburgh convicted him, by majority, of a reduced charge of culpable homicide. They also found him guilty of the attempted cover-up between April and July last year.
By that time, Dunleavy had already been sent to the State Hospital, Carstairs. After the jury verdicts, judge Lord Jones ordered he should stay there while psychiatrists assessed his condition.
Dunleavy returned to court yesterday for the judge to decide the next move, which could have been an indefinite stay in the State Hospital.
Defence QC Gordon Jackson said: "He doesn't want to go to Carstairs. He wants a prison sentence."
The lawyer said medical reports had been prepared for the court but he felt it was his duty to have an independent person look at their recommendations.
Dunleavy will remain in the State Hospital pending a further court hearing.
Three psychiatrists told Dunleavy's trial he clearly had a problem, but it was too early to say what it was. Paranoid schizophrenia was suggested as a possibility.
Dunleavy, giving evidence, insisted the doctors were wrong. "I think the gravity of the crime I am accused of may have coloured their perception," he suggested.
He also complained he could not find a good chess opponent in Carstairs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article