THE father of Mikaeel Kular believes his son was beaten to death by mother Rosdeep Adekoya in a twisted attempt to exact revenge on him.
Zahid Saeed has spoken for the first time since his three-year-old son was killed at home in January.
Adekoya pled guilty to culpable homicide and last month she was sentenced to 11 years in prison.
However, Mr Saeed, whose relationship with Adekoya had ended before their son's death, remains tortured by the idea that little Mikaeel was killed because he bore too close a resemblance to himself.
He believes Adekoya was obsessed with him and was determined to get revenge on him for rejecting her.
He said: "I think she killed Mikaeel because she couldn't stand to see me in him every day. We look the same and we have the same character. My son was the innocent victim. I just wish she'd brought her anger down on me and not him.
"Her obsession made her love me but then it made her hate and resent me. She would stop at nothing to hurt me for rejecting her."
He added: "Every second of the day I wonder whether I could have stopped it, whether I could have done more. What if I had fought stronger - would he still be alive?
"The mind games really started when she found out she was pregnant.
"I was helpless - she refused to put me on the birth certificate so I had no parental rights.
"I would turn up on her doorstep with nappies and formula but she slammed the door in my face."
Mr Saeed also said that despite being in prison, Adekoya was still able to make his life a misery.
He said: "I went to the hospital and begged to see his body but they would only let me see him from behind a glass screen. All I could see was his little hand.
"I was desperate to hold him but they wouldn't let me. Later I found out that she had been allowed in to see him even though she was the one who had taken his life."
Two separate enquiries have been launched into the circumstances surrounding Mikaeel's death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article