A witness in the trial of four men accused of murdering a missing businesswoman told a court she ended up in a psychiatric unit after hearing snippets of a conversation about a woman being held at a house.
Laura Main, 23, said Paul Smith and David Parker arrived at the home she shared with her then partner, Ian Clyde, 24, late in the evening of April 17, 2011.
She said Smith seemed agitated, was unshaven and drunk. The dental nurse told jurors she heard bits of a conversation Smith had with Mr Clyde about a woman being held at a house in West Kilbride, North Ayrshire.
She said: "I thought they were talking about a junkie going cold turkey. They said the woman was agitated at not being allowed out the house." Ms Main did not tell the police about the incident until January 2012 when they were making inquiries about the missing woman, Lynda Spence.
Ms Spence has not been seen since April 2011, and Parker, 38, and Smith, 47, are on trial accused of her murder along with Colin Coats and Philip Wade, both 42.
It is alleged they abducted her and held her at a flat in West Kilbride for up to a fortnight, where prosecutors claim they cut off her thumb and beat her with a hammer and a golf club.
Ms Main said: "If I had known what was happening, I would have gone to the police that night. I ended up in a psychiatric unit because of what it had done to me. It really affected me, because I had kept it to myself."
The court also heard from Alicia Thomson, 23, who said Smith asked her to throw a sim card from a mobile phone into the sea. Ms Thomson said she had been living with Smith since the beginning of April 2011 and the incident occurred in October that year after police left a flyer at their home in Largs regarding Ms Spence's disappearance.
She also told the court she had been threatened by Wade, who held a blade to her neck and told her to "keep your mouth shut".
Dental hygienist Susan Birch, 39, told jurors she saw a woman and a man she knew as Paul Smith on the promenade at Largs. She said the woman was taking something apart that she believed to be a phone, then she threw it into the water.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article