A WITNESS who told police "a detailed cocktail of lies" more than 27 years ago found himself accused of murdering Elaine Doyle.
A trial heard how Allan Cleary, 46, asked a pal to give him a false alibi, when officers investigating the teenager's death questioned clubbers in Greenock.
Mr Cleary, a sales assistant in an electrical shop at the time, admitted in court yesterday he had made "a terrible error of judgement."
Trying to explain it, he said he had been worried about walking the streets alone for a time on the night when Elaine, 16, is thought to have been stripped and strangled. Her body was found near her home on June 2, 1986.
On trial is John Docherty, who denies murder. The 49-year-old's lawyers have drawn up a list of 41 possible suspects which, it is claimed, might include the real killer. The false statements made by Mr Cleary years ago have added him to the list.
The trial heard Mr Cleary met Elaine when he went to the Judy Plum jeweller's - where she was an assistant on a YTS scheme - to buy an earring.
Mr Cleary told detectives at the time he had seen her in the early hours of June 2 at a hamburger stall in the town centre. But the claimed sighting was not true because, it is thought, Elaine was already dead.
Defence QC Donald Findlay suggested there might be an "ulterior motive" for telling "a detailed cocktail of lies." The lawyer asked: " Do you now want to admit to the murder of Elaine Doyle?"
Mr Cleary replied: "No, because I had nothing to do with it."
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article