TWO murderers have lost a legal battle for convicted prisoners to win the right to vote in next year's independence referendum.
Andrew Gillon and Leslie Moohan, and a third long-term prisoner Gary Gibson, challenged the blanket ban on convicted inmates taking part in the ballot on the country's future.
But Lord Glennie yesterday ruled that the judicial reviews brought by the trio, who are all prisoners in Addiewell jail in West Lothian, must be refused.
Gillon and Moohan are both serving life sentences imposed in 1998 and 2008 respectively after being convicted of committing murders and Gibson is serving a term of seven years and four months imposed on him last year.
Lord Glennie said: "None of the petitioners is due to be released until after the date fixed for the referendum. They will all still be serving prisoners at the time of the referendum."
They will be ineligible to vote under the terms of the Franchise Act for the referendum but each wants to cast a vote at the ballot box.
The trio claimed that the blanket ban on convicted prisoners voting in the poll was unlawful and incompatible with their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
They also challenged the decision to exclude them from the franchise on the basis of constitutional rights such as the rule of law, right to vote and respect for international obligations.
They further claimed that where the result of the referendum would or might lead to the loss of European Union rights, the blanket ban was contrary to EU law. The ECHR has previously held a blanket ban on prisoners voting is unlawful.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article