CHILDREN would not have to give evidence in court during criminal trials under proposals backed by the Justice Secretary.
Campaigners believe the overhaul will help improve the way in which vulnerable witnesses are treated in the court system.
But opponents have said it is important for justice that children are given the right to be heard in court and have questioned the impact of the move.
It comes after a review led by Lord Carloway and Lord Justice Clerk found that Scotland is "significantly lagging behind" the rest of the world in the treatment of children and other vulnerable witnesses.
The judges said there was a "compelling" case for children's evidence to be captured in advance of the trial in the form of an interview taken shortly after the initial complaint.
Michael Matheson, justice secretary, has given his support to the move.
He said: "If you go to somewhere like Norway, a child, if they are a witness, never sees a court. They are not cross-examined.
"I recognise the need to have access to a fair trial but I am also confident that, in Norway, they can deliver a fair trial. They can also do it in such a way that recognises the vulnerability of certain witnesses and have measures in place that help address these things more effectively."
Ian Cruickshank, convener of the Law Society of Scotland Criminal Law Committee, welcomed moves to improve the quality of evidence presented, in particularly from vulnerable witnesses, but he said it was "essential any proposal will continue to ensure witness evidence".
David Sinclair, of Victim Support Scotland, said: "We have long advocated improvements to the way vulnerable witnesses are dealt with by the court. Going to court can be a significant ordeal for children."
The Scottish Government said a working group with people from across the justice system will examine the issues in full before reporting back later this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article