ANIMAL welfare workers have criticised a sheriff's decision to allow a pensioner who kept a menagerie of dogs, donkeys, goats and sheep in terrible conditions to keep some of her pets.
Ann Wynd, 75, was found guilty of 29 charges of causing unnecessary suffering to the animals at her home in Standburn, Stirlingshire.
Some of the animals were in such a poor state that they had to be put down and a total of 65 were taken away by Scottish SPCA inspectors when they searched the premises in November 2012.
At Falkirk Sheriff Court, Sheriff Derek O'Carroll imposed a three-year com-munity payback order and banned her from keeping animals for three years -except for four dogs and four sheep. Another four sheep have also now been allowed back after she made improvements to the area where they were kept.
The sheriff said he would review the banning order again in December.
However, SPCA Chief Superintendent Mike Flynn criticised the decision, saying it was "without doubt one of the most tragic cases we have ever dealt with".
He said: "Given the extent of the pain and distress these animals endured we are extremely disappointed 12 animals have been given back to Wynd and that more may be returned to her.
"The scale of suffering involved was horrendous and in our view would have merited Wynd being banned from owning animals for life. While we appreciate the courts must take individual circumstances into account, our concern will always be the welfare of animals."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article