SCOTLAND'S most senior frontline officers have threatened to take legal action against chief constables if they continue to promote police regardless of cuts expected in a year's time.
The Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (Asps) has warned the continuing promotion of officers is "untenable" and that a moratorium should be imposed.
A number of forces have run recent promotion drives. More than a dozen superintendents and a number of inspectors have been appointed across the country.
The move to a single force on April 1, 2013, will require a "rationalisation of senior ranks" and Asps fears experienced superintendents will be forced out. Fully sworn officers cannot be made redundant, but under Regulation A19, officers with more than 30 years' service can be asked to leave.
One officer said: "It's like a game of musical chairs. Everyone knows we are moving to a single force and that next year less senior ranks will be required but they seem to want to get as many people promoted from their force area as possible, so that when the music stops they're in a stronger position."
Chief officers have pledged to cut £5.4 million through cutbacks and efficiency savings in senior ranks. Superintendents earn around £62,000.
A letter from Asps president David O'Connor to the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (Acpos) calls for a more "collegiate" response from the eight chief constables. It says the continuing promotion of officers sends out the wrong message when police are meant to be "sharing the pain".
The letter states: "We would suggest the current situation is simply untenable and the service – and Acpos – has reached a point where a moratorium should be placed upon substantive promotions. This decision must be predicated on the realities of future convergence.
"Some chief constables might argue that the absence of clarity regarding the new structures renders any such decision unnecessary at the present time and that existing local procedures should therefore continue. We would suggest that this would be a short-sighted view. You will appreciate that our major concern is that Regulation A19 will be used to reduce management posts in large numbers after the new police service is introduced. Should that situation arise, we would legally challenge it as a staff association.
"Part of that challenge would include an assertion the situation could have been avoided if a more consistent and corporate approach had been taken at an early stage by chief constables – on the reasonable assumption by them that management restructuring would be a major element of implementing the new structures – to suspend substantive promotions until proper clarity was achieved regarding the number of senior ranks required."
Asps has called for the single force's new chief constable to be appointed as a matter of urgency. It believes the new chief needs to be in place as soon as possible to make key decisions.
"This will include an assessment of how many superintendents and other senior ranks are required by the single force.
Assistant Chief Constable Cliff Anderson, general secretary of Acpos, said: "The promotion of officers at any level in a force is a matter for the chief constable and will be based on operational needs and force balance.
"The resilience and efficiency of the eight individual forces is extremely important as we move towards police reform and a single Scottish service.
"We must also maintain the excellent service levels for which Scottish policing is well known and for that we need the right levels of officers at senior and supervisory ranks."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article