entertainer Rolf Harris targeted young fans whose "penalty" for their admiration was to be sexually assaulted by him, a court heard.
The 84-year-old, who is accused of a string of indecent assaults, was an arrogant and brazen man who thought he was "untouchable" and "invincible", Southwark Crown Court, London, heard.
In her closing speech at the artist's trial, prosecutor Sasha Wass, QC, accused him of grooming his daughter's friend, treating her like a "pet" and a "prostitute".
Ms Wass told the jury: "In this case it's the word of 10 independent victims, all who have given chillingly similar accounts of sexual abuse and exploitation by a man whose public image was pristine, lilywhite.
"These victims saw the dark side of Rolf Harris, they saw the side of Rolf Harris who admitted he was sexually attracted to a 13-year-old girl.
"They saw the side of Rolf Harris who admitted engaging in sexual activity with his daughter's best friend in the presence of his daughter.
"They saw the side to Rolf Harris which traded on his public image to envelop children and young women in his famous bear hugs and sexually abuse them in circumstances in which they were unable to escape."
Mr Harris denies 12 counts of indecent assault on four different alleged victims - seven of which relate to a friend of his daughter.
The court has heard the woman claims he first abused her when she was 13. Mr Harris said they had a consensual relationship that did not begin until she was 18.
Ms Wass told the jury the star singled out girls who were mesmerised and beguiled by his fame, treating them as sexual objects he could "maul" when he felt like it.
She said: "He targeted fans who were mesmerised by his fame and talents. And the penalty of their admiration was to suffer sexual assault."
The QC said each woman, unknown to the others, described a similar pattern of "deviant sexual behaviour" and had not reported their experiences earlier as they feared going against "the great Rolf Harris".
The case continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article