Professor Neil Hutton, expert in sentencing at Strathclyde University
"The Herald investigations have identified questions raised in the report which need to be addressed. The Scottish Government should give serious consideration to setting up some form of public inquiry."
James Chalmers senior lecturer in law at Edinburgh University
"Ideally, there would still be a further appeal, and if questions are left unanswered at the end of that process then an inquiry may be necessary to restore public confidence. What matters most is doing justice in the case itself, which clearly still has some way to run."
Jonathan Mitchell QC
"I think there is a public interest in the disclosure of all of this and complete transparency. We have to put this out in the public domain."
Professor Lindsay Farmer of Glasgow University
"There was a sense at the time when the trial was completed that it had been a major challenge for the Scottish criminal justice system and that it was completed successfully. The issues that are now coming to light raise questions about whether this was in fact the case. It would be better to have this out in the open now rather than continuing to sweep it under the carpet. This is not going to go away."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We have shown consistently that we want to be as open and transparent as we can be on all aspects surrounding the Al-Megrahi case. That is why we have brought forward the Criminal Cases (Punishment and Review) Bill to aid publication of the Statement of Reasons.
"It is in the public interest that the Statement of Reasons is published as soon as possible and we are doing all that we can for this to happen.
"With virtually every passing day, more and more of the content of the SCCRC's Statement of Reasons in the Al-Megrahi case comes into the public domain. Ministers firmly believe that this selective reporting of the information only emphasises the importance of the SCCRC being able to decide to disclose information in the Al-Megrahi case.
"The Justice Secretary has written again to Ken Clarke to provide an update on how the SCCRC can comply with data protection and make the road clearer for disclosure."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article