A Scottish entrepreneur has been hit with the biggest ever fine imposed by Britain's financial watchdog.
Stewart Ford, founder of Keydata, which collapsed in 2009, has been ordered to pay £75m by the Financial Conduct Authority or FCA.
The regulator found that Mr Ford failed to act with integrity and also misled the its predecessor, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) relation to the performance of his investment products.
Mr Ford - and two colleagues Mark Owen and Peter Johnson, who have received smaller fines of £4m and £200,000 respectively - are understood to be appealing the decision to a tribunal.
Keydata went in to administration after selling so-called "death bonds", derivatives of second-hand life insurance policies of elderly Americans from companies based in Luxembourg called SLS and Lifemark.
The FCA, in a decision notice, said: "The FCA's view is that the three individuals permitted Keydata to continue to sell the Lifemark-backed products to retail investors when the individuals were aware that it was highly likely the products did not comply with regulations, that the financial promotions were unclear, incorrect and misleading, that the due diligence on the products was inadequate and that there were problems with the performance of the portfolio ultimately underlying the products. "
Mr Ford has always denied wrongdoing and has said he will file a civil action against the FCA and accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers seeking £650m in damages.
He said the old FSA had "knowingly exceeded its statutory authority in order to bring down Keydata as a blatant attempt to prove it could be effective after its disastrous handling of bank regulation in the lead-up to the 2008/9 financial crisis."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article