THE prosecution in the trial of a man accused of murdering missing bookkeeper Suzanne Pilley believe she was killed and taken to a "lonely grave", a court has heard.
Advocate depute Alex Prentice, QC, told the jury at the High Court in Edinburgh that the 38-year-old was murdered by David Gilroy in the basement of the building where they both worked on May 4, 2010.
During his closing speech, Mr Prentice said it was an "unusual" case as there was "no evidence of a dead body".
Gilroy, 49, from the Silverknowes area of the city, denies murdering Ms Pilley in Thistle Street, Edinburgh, or elsewhere in Scotland, by unknown means on May 4, 2010.
He also pleads not guilty to a charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice between May 4 and May 6, 2010, by concealing Ms Pilley's body and transporting it to various locations in Scotland in the boot of a car.
Earlier, defence QC Jack Davidson told jurors Gilroy had decided not to give evidence in the trial.
The court heard from witnesses called by the defence who worked in the same office building as Gilroy and Ms Pilley, and said they had not noticed anything out of the ordinary on the day she disappeared.
A police officer who had searched Gilroy's car days later said he had not noticed any smell in the boot.
The prosecution's closing speech began with Mr Prentice telling jurors how Ms Pilley had been seen making her "routine journey" to work on the morning of May 4, 2010.
He said: "The Crown case is that Suzanne Pilley met David Gilroy on that morning; that they went to the basement in the building together, quite possibly with the consent of both; that he killed her, he placed her body in the recess, he got his car from home, brought it to the garage, placed her dead body in the boot, took her home and next day transported her to a lonely grave somewhere in Argyll where she is now."
Mr Prentice said he had to establish to the jury Suzanne Pilley is dead and said they should reject the idea she could have committed suicide.
He said she had not made any arrangements for her cat Mercury to be cared for and she had not withdrawn money from her bank account nor used her credit cards.
Mr Prentice said: "I suggest there is absolutely no basis for thinking she is somewhere else, alive, hiding from family and friends."
Voicemails left on her phone on May 1, 2010, were played in court. Mr Prentice said they were from Gilroy, asking her to get in touch and that he was "a wee bit worried".
Mr Prentice said the calls, voicemails and text messages stopped the day before she went missing and Gilroy did not text after that day.
He added there was "nothing from him, nothing at all". He said: "I suggest the most glaringly obvious reason for that is he knows there is no purpose in doing that because she is dead and he has her phone."
Mr Prentice claimed all the "different strands" made up the "cable of evidence". He told the jury that taking all these strands together "creates a compelling and convincing case of murder committed by David Gilroy".
He added: "I suggest there really is only one just and appropriate verdict in this case. I would ask you to return a verdict of guilty to both of the charges."
Trial judge Lord Bracadale told jurors Mr Davidson would give his defence speech today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article