A MAN accused of Britain's biggest banking fraud was "a gamble or two away from destroying Switzerland's largest bank for his own gain", a court heard.
Kweku Adoboli, 32, is accused of gambling away £1.4 billion while working as a UBS trader.
At one point he was at risk of causing the bank losses of $12bn (£7.4bn), jurors at Southwark Crown Court were told.
Adoboli, who is facing two counts of fraud and two counts of false accounting between October 2008 and last September, lost the money on high risk trades aimed at boosting his annual bonuses and job prospects.
Sasha Wass, QC, for the prosecution, said: "He is on trial because he lost his bank $2.3bn. He fraudulently gambled it away. He did all of this by exceeding his trading limits, by inventing fictitious deals to conceal this and then he lied to his bosses.
"Mr Adoboli's motive for this behaviour was to increase his bonus, his status, his job prospects and, of course, his ego."
Adoboli worked for UBS buying and selling exchange traded funds, which track bonds or commodities such as metals.
The bank used hedging to reduce risk, which means buying one type of investment while simultaneously selling a similar one to mitigate any possible loss.
Prosecutors claim Adoboli failed to hedge several of his investments to boost profits and earn a larger bonus.
Adoboli, from White-chapel, London, was described by the prosecution as a "rogue trader" and a "naked gambler" who "fraudulently side-stepped" the bank's rules.
Jurors heard that Adoboli, a public school-educated former headboy who got a job at UBS in 2003 as a graduate then worked his way up, will claim he was not acting dishonestly and that colleagues knew what he had been doing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article