A FORMER police officer is facing jail for helping himself to £60,000 from his elderly mother’s bank account to fund a lavish spending spree with his wife.
Former firearms officer Andrew Rough and his wife Jean, herself an ex-police constable, drained the bank accounts of Gladys Rough over almost five years.
They used the funds to pay the mortgage of an upmarket, new-build home and spent more on hunting, shooting and fishing supplies, and a new game gun.
They also spent her cash on deposits on a summer house for their back garden and laser eye surgery for Andrew Rough.
The theft began after Gladys Rough’s husband, Andrew snr, was taken to hospital with a stroke and she handed her son and daughter-in-law her bank cards to do her £30 weekly shop and to collect money to pay her gardener and cleaner. She also gave them power of attorney and handed over her bank statements to them unopened.
Stirling Sheriff Court heard there was no dispute the pair had then made “repeated” withdrawals and purchases, taking up to £12,000 a year, and finally running one account down to just 37p causing a direct debit to bounce and Gladys Rough’s phone to be cut off.
Gladys Rough, now 86, who endured four-and-a-half days of lawyers’ questions over a video link, said she had told them they could also use her cards for themselves “if they were stuck”.
But Rough, who shot for Scotland and the British Police team insisted there were “no riders, no restrictions, no limits”.
He claimed he and his wife were free to use his mother’s money however they wished.
Sheriff William Gilchrist told jurors an analogy might be someone who told a babysitter to help themselves to food and drink, but then found they had taken the entire contents of the wine cellar.
As Gladys Rough’s money was spent, the couple enjoyed three holidays a year and he went off on shooting weekends costing more than £500 a time.
But the court heard the pair now had almost nothing left, and were living in a one-bedroom flat in Alloa, Clackmannanshire, that belonged to their grown-up son.
Some £60,000 was taken between September 2010 and July 2015.
Andrew Rough’s advocate Lewis Kennedy said there was “nothing sinister” in any of the transactions.
Dale Hughes, for Jean Rough, said Gladys Rough had told them “repeatedly” to take what they needed for themselves, and in doing so had given them a mandate to make withdrawals for whatever they needed.
But after a 10-day trial, the jury of nine women and six men took less than two hours to find the Roughs, of Alloa, guilty of embezzling the £60,000. Sentence was deferred for reports until September 13, and they were released on bail.
Police were called in by social workers in 2015 after the cutting-off of Gladys Rough’s phone caused her panic alarm to stop working. The court heard the Roughs had wanted to get “utter control” over Gladys Rough, and became angry when officials started to probe their dealings.
They had moved in November 2012 into a four-bedroom new-build house in Alloa, with the intention Gladys Rough would live with them and her husband would go into a care home close by.
But Andrew Rough, senior, did not move, and Gladys Rough decided to return to her own home in Gargunnock, Stirlingshire, where she had many friends.
The new house more than doubled the cost of the Roughs’ mortgage, and the pair began to use Gladys Rough’s money to make up the shortfall. Gladys Rough said she had been “shocked and stunned” to find that large sums had gone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article