An antiques dealer who offered parts of a tiger and leopard for sale online has been fined £1,000 in court.
Richard Wales, 49, tried to sell a tiger’s head mounted on a wooden shield, and leopard and tiger claws, over the internet.
Wales, from Melrose in the Scottish Borders, admitted breaching the regulations designed to protect endangered species from illegal trade during a hearing at Jedburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday.
The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), which revealed details of the case, said the court heard police discovered adverts placed by Wales on two sales websites.
A search of his home in September 2015 uncovered a mounted tiger’s head on a wall, which Wales said he had removed from a tiger rug.
An expert from the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) concluded it was the same head offered for sale in the Gumtree advert.
Other eBay adverts, from Wales’ “theexplorersstudy” account, offering tiger and leopard claws for sale, were also examined.
Claws of tigers and leopards cannot be sold without a licence from the UK Government’s Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra).
Prosecutors were also granted an order forfeiting the tiger’s head, valued at £3,200, COPFS said.
Laura Buchan, assistant procurator fiscal for specialist casework, said: “This illegal trade has a harmful effect on the conservation status of tigers and contributes to their decline in the wild.
“Richard Wales failed in his responsibilities and as a result stands convicted of a criminal offence.
“It’s vitally important that those in the antiques trade fully understand the legislation as well as take seriously their obligations in respect of the trade in items from endangered species.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here