HUMANISTS have criticised a lack of action over religious observance in Scottish schools.
The Humanist Society Scotland (HSS) said it was "disappointed" ministers had no plans to change current practice despite two UK-wide reports on the issue.
In December the Commission on Religion and Belief in British Public Life said the current legal requirement for schools to hold acts of collective worship should be repealed and replaced by a requirement to hold "inclusive times for reflection". Similar calls were made in a report by the Arts and Humanities Research Council on Collective Worship.
Gordon MacRae, chief executive of the HSS, said: "We are very disappointed the Scottish Government will not be taking any action as a result of these two high-profile reports.
"Scotland has historically been at the forefront in pursuing progressive reforms to the treatment of philosophy and belief in education, so this is discouraging.
"The two reports analysed the policy situation across the UK, including a detailed assessment of what happens in Scotland, and both reports concluded that religious observance needs to be reformed.
"We know that the Scottish Government haven’t undertaken a serious review of this policy since 2005, and we think its time has come. It’s time that education policy reflected the reality of modern Scottish society."
In 2012 the HSS said the legal right of parents to withdraw their children from religious education and religious observance was being widely ignored in state schools.
Since 2005, Scottish schools have been required to make parents aware they can remove their children from religious education and observance.
However, churches believe religious observance in all schools is so inclusive that there would be very few occasions when a parent felt they should exercise the right to opt out.
According to the 2011 Census Scotland is moving away from Christianity. Figures showed 54 per cent of residents saw themselves as Christian - down 11 per cent in 2001.
Alison McInnes, a Liberal Democrat MSP who has campaigned on the issue, also called for a review by the Scottish Government.
She said: "It’s been over ten years since the Scottish Government undertook the last serious review into how having a time for reflection in schools fits into education policy.
"These two reports and their recommendations should have been the spark for ministers to take the reins on promoting a modern and inclusive society. "Religious observance in schools springs from another century. A school assembly can have an important role in fostering a sense of community, but only if it reflects the diversity of the community locally."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "There is no legal requirement in Scotland for schools to hold acts of collective worship. Instead, the terms "religious observance" or "time for reflection" are used in statute and guidance.
"Education Scotland guidance on religious observance and time for reflection explains how effective religious observance may take a variety of forms and need not include worship at all."
The report of the Independent Commission on Religion and Belief in British Public Life includes the recommendation that: "All pupils in state-funded schools should have a statutory entitlement to a curriculum about religion, philosophy and ethics that is relevant to today’s society and the broad framework of such a curriculum should be nationally agreed.
"The legal requirement for schools to hold acts of collective worship should be repealed, and replaced by a requirement to hold inclusive times for reflection."
society is calling for a change to the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 to make religious observance an opt-in activity, rather than an opt-out one, as is currently the case.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel