SECONDARY headteachers have set out their radical vision for the running of Scottish education with more direct funding of schools at the expense of councils.
Jim Thewliss, general secretary of School Leaders' Scotland, said school budgets should be handed over to headteachers so money could be directed towards local priorities.
READ MORE: Free tuition policy "damaging" drive to get poorer pupils to university
Under the model schools would be required to spend a set amount of money on teachers set out in a proposed national minimum staffing formula, but would have flexibility over where the rest was spent.
Currently school budgets are controlled by councils with a staffing formula set at local authority level and passed on to schools with limited flexibility.
However, Mr Thewliss stressed there was no appetite amongst secondary headteachers to follow the free school or Academy model adopted in England where secondaries are entirely removed from council control and run by independent boards.
Instead, he wants to see councils continue to exert control over major educational funding projects such as new buildings and functions such as human resources and quality assurance of standards.
Mr Thewliss also said services for pupils with additional support needs such as educational psychology would continue to be run by councils.
The intervention comes amidst growing tension over the future role of councils in the running of Scottish schools.
Local authority leaders have warned that SNP proposals to give more funding directly to headteachers could damage the drive to improve attainment by restricting the use of the funding.
However, Scotland's Finance Secretary Derek Mackay said the plans, included in the party's election manifesto, would give "real power" to schools.
READ MORE: Councils attack SNP moves to give more money to headteachers
Mr Thewliss said: "We need to invert the pyramid so instead of local authorities deciding how to divide a central pot of money amongst schools headteachers would have this funding and would decide on their own priorities based on the schools own particular needs in partnership with parents.
"That would set up a different relationship between councils and schools which would be more designed to allow the school to support the needs identified within the school pupil population.
"What happens at the moment is that the level of funding which schools get from the council is passed through a number of filters because councils organise children's services in different ways, but if you give schools responsibility for the deliver of education and the power to commission services from a local authority it would be more suited to local needs."
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union, gave a cautious welcome to the proposals, but called for close scrutiny of the impact.
He said: "The EIS is not opposed to greater budgets being devolved to school level as a means of enhancing resource budgets, empowering schools and effectively ring-fencing education spending.
"Clear guidelines would need to be in place around additional expenditure, however, to ensure equity and transparency and to address potential drawbacks such as economies of scale being lost, some schools not having the necessary structures in place to determine how funds should be spent and the threat of significant workload implications for already overworked headteachers.
"The EIS believes that it is important, therefore, that the role of local authorities as the employers should continue, ensuring a degree of consistency and equity of core provision around the deployment of teaching and support staff."
READ MORE: Free tuition policy "damaging" drive to get poorer pupils to university
Earlier this week David O’Neill, president of council umbrella body Cosla, said altering how schools were funded or run "could make things worse" by effectively ring-fencing money in the classroom that could go towards programmes in communities that help children.
The proposals were contained in the SNP manifesto which also included the setting up of education regions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel