CAMPAIGNERS have called for a root and branch review of controversial public-private contracts across the country.
The move by trade unions, a left wing think tank and anti-PPP campaign groups follows concerns over recent defects in Edinburgh schools.
A letter signed by the STUC, Unite, Unison Scotland, NASUWT, the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) and the Common Weal argues the problems should be looked at in other authorities.
Read more: Architect to lead independent inquiry into Edinburgh schools closure
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: “The recent experience of both pupils and teachers in Edinburgh underlines the importance of a wholescale review of the PPP/PFI initiative in relation to the ongoing exorbitant costs to the public purse."
Dave Watson, Unison Scotland’s head of policy, said PPP and PFI contracts constituted poor value for the taxpayer and lacked the flexibility that public services needed.
He added: "We welcome the call for a full inquiry that should be wider than simply Edinburgh schools. In particular, it should look at the prospects for ending existing contracts and using low public sector borrowing costs to replace expensive private sector debt."
Read more: Architect to lead independent inquiry into Edinburgh schools closure
Earlier this month it was announced that all of the Edinburgh schools closed amid safety fears had been repaired ahead of schedule by the Edinburgh Schools Partnership (ESP).
In total 17 PPP schools were closed with 7,600 pupils affected as the council put in place a huge logistical plan to provide alternative arrangements.
Read more: Architect to lead independent inquiry into Edinburgh schools closure
All the schools were built or refurbished as part of the same public-private partnership scheme. The council took the decision to shut them after ESP said it was unable to provide safety assurances for the properties.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel