THE introduction of standardised testing for Scottish primary school pupils has been condemned by a senior trade unionist.
Helen Connor, president of the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), launched a fierce attack on the assessments - set to be introduced later this year - arguing Scotland's children "deserve better".
The Scottish Government argues the new assessments are a key part of its work to close the attainment gap between rich and poor because they will provide better information about pupil progress.
Currently, all local authorities test pupils, but ministers say that because assessments are different and the results are not collated nationally it is much harder to assess what is working.
However, Ms Connor, who has been a teacher for 32 years and is a member of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), said she would not give the tests to pupils.
She added: "I'll tell you how you don't tackle the attainment gap and that is by continually testing children by the use of standardised tests. As a teacher and as a professional I will not give the same test to all children when I know that their abilities are different.
"Why do we differentiate our teaching and then administer the same test? I didn't come into teaching to see children fail. Just as well I'm retiring soon as I will not sacrifice my professionalism and the self-confidence of my pupils in order to provide the Scottish Government with data. Our children deserve better."
Ms Connor made the comments as she addressed the STUC annual congress in Aviemore in the Highlands, saying that in the time she had worked as a teacher in primary and secondary schools she could "rarely recall a period when I was more angry than I am now".
She said that while the Scottish Government has stated it wants to close the attainment gap, ministers are "at the same time cutting back on money given to local authorities which run education".
As part of efforts to close the attainment gap, ministers are providing £120 million extra cash through the Attainment Scotland Fund, with the money going direct to headteachers.
However, Ms Connor went on to warn that, although additional money for education was always welcome, the decision to bypass councils was "fraught with danger".
She added: "It can undermine the role of local authorities in running our schools and being accountable for doing so. It could, longer-term, lead to the Academy approach which we see down south.
"Let me be very clear to the Scottish Government and indeed the Scottish Tories. That approach will not be tolerated in Scotland. We value our children's education too much to allow it to become a lottery."
The STUC president argued tackling poverty was key to ending the attainment gap, describing the problem as being one "which goes far wider than the education system".
She stated: "How do you expect children to attain when they are hungry, don't have heating in their homes or indeed a permanent home?
"Tackling this issue is a wider societal issue. Schools can help but the deep-rooted causes of poverty begin far earlier than that."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “We have no plans to introduce Academies. We believe that collaboration, not competition, between schools will help raise the bar for all children and close the attainment gap.
“As part of our reforms we are reviewing school governance to ensure decisions on learning are made as close to the child as possible. This approach is built on strong international evidence that shows empowered schools and engaged parents lead to better educational outcomes.
"The Pupil Equity Fund will provide £120m of additional support, allocated directly to schools, to target closing the attainment gap. Headteachers, will ensure maximum impact and best value by working together with each other, their local authority and their other partners."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel