A PLEDGE to reduce the “crippling” workload of Scottish teachers has failed to deliver, according to a survey.
A study found 86 per cent of school staff believe workload has actually got worse since Deputy First Minister John Swinney promised to reduce it last year as one of his first acts as Education Secretary.
As a result, 54 per cent of the 1,000 members who took part in the survey by the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union said they would not recommend the profession to others.
Larry Flanagan, the union’s general secretary, said: “Whilst I don’t doubt the intention of the Deputy First Minister to address teacher concerns, the simple fact is that it isn’t happening.
“As ever in Scottish education, there is a gap between rhetoric and reality so maybe time needs to be spent on actually dealing with the problem.
“Teachers should be the best advert for the profession, but if 54 per cent are saying they wouldn’t recommend it as a career, that’s a very clear sign for government and employers that action needs to be taken.”
However, Mr Swinney said the government was "absolutely committed" to freeing up teachers to teach.
He said: "We have already acted to reduce workload as agreed with the EIS and others and we are removing mandatory unit assessments.
"We have also issued a definitive statement that clearly sets out, for all teachers, what they should and should not be asked to do."
In May last year an official review concluded that the introduction of new qualifications in Scotland had led to an "unintended and unsustainable" workload for pupils and teachers.
As a result Mr Swinney said the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) would reduce the volume of reassessment and recording, cut bureaucracy, remove unnecessary duplication and carry out a review of quality assurance arrangements relating to new qualifications.
Schools quango Education Scotland was also tasked with introducing clearer guidance to schools on what was expected of them under the Curriculum for Excellence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel