PUPILS in some disadvantaged communities perform more than twice as well at school as their deprived counterparts elsewhere in Scotland, new figures show.
According to a three year analysis of results by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation 60 per cent of pupils from poor neighbourhoods in East Dunbartonshire achieved five or more National 5 qualifications between 2014 and 2017.
Read more: Financial help with school trips and uniforms 'vital' for poorest pupils
Other councils where the poorest pupils performed particularly well include East Renfrewshire, Moray, South Ayrshire, West Lothian and West Dunbartonshire.
At the other end of the scale only a quarter of pupils from the most disadvantaged communities in the Scottish Borders achieved five or more National 5 qualifications.
Pupils from disadvantaged areas in Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen City, Clackmannanshire and the Highlands also achieved significantly lower levels of results.
Jim McCormick, associate director for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation in Scotland, said the table highlighted the significant impact schools could have on the fortunes of pupils from disadvantaged areas.
He said: “Looking at attainment for children living in the most deprived neighbourhoods across Scotland shows a highly variable picture.
“While the number and characteristics of deprived areas varies across local authorities, this comparison suggests that attainment varies
substantially within deprived areas.
“The reasons for this are not fully understood, but we can speculate that these are likely to include school leadership, the use of data to inform practice, improvements in teaching and targeted resourcing. Relationships with families and communities are also crucial.”
Jacqui MacDonald, East Dunbartonshire’s chief education officer, said the councils was focussed on closing the attainment gap.
She said: “We track the progress of every pupil from an early stage and support them throughout.
“We also carry out rigorous analysis of the attainment information we get on qualifications and encourage the sharing of good practice across all our schools in order to support continuous improvement.”
The analysis on exam results is contained in a written submission to the Scottish Parliament’s education committee, which is looking at the significant impact poverty has on attainment.
In a separate submission, Kevin Lowden, research officer for the Robert Owen Centre for Educational Change at Glasgow University, said one of the initiatives which had the greatest impact on closing the attainment gap was collaboration between schools performing at different levels.
He said: “The evidence suggests that federations involving higher and lower attaining schools significantly outperform non-federated counterparts, although this takes two to four years to impact on student outcomes.
“There is a positive impact on student attainment in both the higher and lower attaining schools.”
Last year, ministers were accused of ditching a flagship scheme to drive up standards by twinning schools. In 2013 the Scottish Government announced an initiative to partner underperforming schools with those punching above their weight, but funding was only provided for three years.
Read more: Ministers ditch flagship scheme to twin schools
Mr Lowden went on to highlight some of the risks of direct funding of schools in the wake of the government’s Pupil Equity Fund, which gives money to headteachers in schools serving poorer areas.
He said: “This is a risk ... where, quite rightly, schools are eager to demonstrate an impact on learning outcomes quickly and can be tempted to buy in a solution by adopting an intervention that is seen to work elsewhere without framing it within their own context, relevance to their curriculum, learner needs or capacity or capability for effective implementation.
“In addition to focusing on the learning level schools should also invest in building leadership capacity and promoting authentic relationships between schools and families and communities.”
To view the full table of results, click Attainment and poverty table.pdf
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel