STUDENT leaders say that a £4.9 million shortfall in bursary and childcare funding is "extremely worrying".
The figure emerged in a briefing paper from the Scottish Funding Council detailing how money is allocated around the country's colleges.
Colleges requested an extra £12m in 2013, but received just £7.1m, leaving £4.9m of demand unmet, it revealed.
Gordon Maloney, president of the National Union of Students (NUS) in Scotland, said: "These figures are extremely worrying news for Scottish college students.
"Not only is there a £4.9m shortfall in bursary and childcare funding - even after additional funding was provided through the last Scottish Budget - but demand for this vital funding has also doubled in the past year, without the cash there to meet this."
The NUS welcomed "continued protection" of further education student support, but said politicians need to come together and make sure the necessary money is provided.
"Additionally, there needs to be real and genuine reform to the system, with students knowing what they are entitled to, and their funding guaranteed, before they even set foot on a college campus," he said.
Liam McArthur, the Scottish Liberal Democrat education spokesman, also went on the attack, blaming Scottish Government funding cuts to the further education sector.
"When Liberal Democrat MSPs raised this issue with the Education Secretary, answers there came few," he said.
"With students now at his door, Education Secretary Michael Russell cannot continue to dodge the growing frustration towards his college cuts."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it was "committed to funding students in line with the NUS call for them to have money in their pockets".
He added: "For the next academic year we have provided protection from inflation for further education student support, despite substantial cuts to our budget by the UK Government.
"The total value of college bursaries package will rise to a record high of around £105 million ensuring that college students are better off and able to fulfil their potential as they progress their studies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article