THE Scottish Government has come under fire over a fall in the number of women studying at Scotland's colleges.
Labour and the Tories both pressed the SNP administration on the issue, saying there were now some 80,000 fewer female college students than when the Nationalists came to power.
Youth employment minister Angela Constance stressed that the majority of college students were women.
But Labour leader Johann Lamont used a debate on women in Scotland to highlight the issue, telling her: "When you make a decision to invest in full-time college places you have to understand the consequences being borne by women who need part-time places because of their caring responsibilities."
Fellow Labour MSP Jenny Marra joined in the attack, saying there were now 80,000 less women in our colleges than 2007, as she urged Ms Constance to review that to see if "there is anything she can do about getting more women back into college".
Tory Mary Scanlon was also critical of the SNP's record, telling MSPs: "In the academic year 2005-06 there were 257,000 female enrolments at college. Seven years later the figure stands at 155,000 - that's a reduction of 39.5% in the number of courses undertaken by women."
Ms Scanlon said while this had affected women of all ages, those between 25 and 59 had been hit "particularly hard" with 50,000 fewer female adult learners in colleges.
But Ms Constance told them: "It is important to remember women are not in the minority in our college sector, the majority of college students are women."
While she accepted some women may wish to study part-time, the minister said there was a need for more women to be on full-time courses that would help them get into work.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article