TWO American literary classics have been dropped by an exam board in England after pressure from Coalition Education Secretary Michael Gove.
To Kill a Mockingbird and Of Mice and Men have been deleted from the GCSE exam after Scots-born Mr Gove called for British works to be studied.
Mr Gove, who studied English at Oxford University, has also seen Arthur Miller's The Crucible left out.
Both books are widely read by pupils in Scotland for their English exams.
However, neither is on draft GCSE English Literature syllabus of Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (OCR) south of the Border.
The Department for Education says it wants pupils to appreciate the "power of the English literary heritage" and more pre-20th Century works.
In future, GCE course content will include at least one William Shakespeare play, a selection of work by the Romantic poets, a 19th Century novel, a selection of poetry since 1850 and a 20th Century novel or drama.
OCR said it was dropping them because of the education department's desire for the exam to be more traditionally focussed.
It added that there were fewer opportunities to include them in the new syllabus.
Mr Gove has said that new exams would be more rigorous to ensure that pupils have read the whole book.
He has previously expressed concern that pupils were reading Of Mice and Men in particular.
Paul Dodd, OCR's head of GCSE and A-Level reform said Mr Gove "had a particular dislike for Of Mice and Men and was disappointed that more than 90% of candidates were studying it".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article