THE passage of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence from educational concept to classroom reality has been a perilous one.
As new research shows, there is still significant uncertainty over CfE, even as 54,000 secondary pupils move towards the first exams in 2014.
The study by Stirling University highlights a succession of concerns, from wide variations between schools, workload issues for teachers and a lack of time for preparation.
Its conclusions will make familiar reading for teaching unions, who have raised the same issues time and again in the eight years since the launch of CfE by the former Scottish Executive.
At the time, the initiative was broadly welcomed by the educational community for its underlying principle of moving education away from the dull regurgitation of facts to pass exams.
Instead, CfE was to usher in a new style of learning, better suited to the fast-changing modern economy which relies on creative thinking and resourcefulness.
Unfortunately, a number of key issues hampered the progress of CfE from the start.
Previous educational reforms such as Higher Still were criticised because they were imposed from the centre, so policymakers decided CfE should develop naturally in classrooms.
But that message was never articulated clearly enough and the initiative was allowed to drift without leadership.
In addition, early CfE material, much of it produced by former curriculum body Learning and Teaching Scotland, was vague and confusing.
The Scottish Government argues that, in recent years, ministers have taken a proactive approach in providing direct support for schools.
The concerns highlighted by Stirling University also predate the most recent £3.5 million support package, which the Educational Institute of Scotland union has hailed as a significant breakthrough.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article