SCOTTISH colleges are facing calls to invest millions of pounds of former reserves in improving student support and the quality of teaching.
The call follows a major reform of the sector which saw colleges move some £100 million of reserves into arms length foundations to protect them for the future.
Because the reforms meant colleges became public bodies there were no longer able to hold the money as traditional reserves.
Under the terms of the new Arms Length Foundation (ALFs) that were set up, any transferred funds must be spent on supporting further education in Scotland.
However, the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union was warned of growing concern over the use of the foundations.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: "The fact Scotland's colleges have moved almost £100m in cash reserves out of public sector funds and into ALFs raises a number of significant concerns.
"Shifting these reserves into ALFs removes the option of this funding being pooled by government for reinvestment across the sector.
"Given that these substantial cash reserves have been built up at a time of significant austerity and cuts to provision, this raises serious questions about whether this money is being put to best use to support learning and teaching across Scotland.
"At a time when lecturer and support staff jobs have been cut, courses have been withdrawn and student places and support have been slashed, we must question if these cash reserves could have been put to much better use to support learning and teaching across Scotland."
Gordon Maloney, president of student body NUS Scotland, said it was "wrong" that money was deposited in arms length foundations when there were shortages in student support funding.
He added: "When college students don't have enough financial support to make ends meet, it's shocking that millions of unspent college funds have been squirrelled away.
"The college sector has undergone some difficult changes over the past few years, and students and staff have taken on much of the burden. Hiding away cash in secretive foundations, with little transparency, is no way to make sure that our public money is spent where it's needed most.
"We need to open up these foundations to scrutiny and make sure the tens of millions of pounds sitting in them go where it's needed most - across all our colleges, ensuring the necessary funding for bursaries, teaching and places."
However, Shona Struthers, chief executive of Colleges Scotland, said the creation of the foundations was a vital way of protecting the money so it could be spent on further education.
She said: "The creation of arm's length foundations was to ensure that the money already generated by colleges, including some non-public money generated by commercial activities, could continue to be used to benefit colleges, staff and learners.
"The arm's length foundations were established at a time when the colleges were no longer able to hold cash reserves as a result of being reclassified as public bodies.
"If colleges had continued to spend the reserves then this would have resulted in the Scottish Government reducing its funding to colleges by this amount.
"This is because this would count towards the Scottish Government budget limit, and could be ultimately deducted from the Scottish block grant, adversely affecting public sector spending in Scotland."
A freedom of information request by the EIS revealed which colleges had put most money into the new foundations.
Nineteen out of 26 colleges reported that they had transferred funds over the previous 18 months with £38m placed in national ALFs and £61m in local ALFs.
The largest amount transferred to an ALF was £21m by City of Glasgow College.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article