COUNCILS have raised doubts over the need for a new post of Chief Education Officer with responsibility for closing the attainment gap.
The proposal is contained in The Education (Scotland) Bill which places a greater emphasis on the need for local authorities to improve the performance of pupils from disadvantaged areas.
It places a new statutory duty on councils to "have regard to the desirability" of reducing inequalities, with the drive led by the new officers.
However, a submission from council umbrella body Cosla to the Scottish Parliament's education committee states: "Cosla's position is that we remain to be convinced that all councils should be required to have a chief education officer.
"The chief education officer proposal appears to add little value to education services, as most authorities already employ senior staff with education qualifications and experience.
"We do not have answers to key questions on the qualifications that will be required by law for chief education officers. We also have a number of practical questions regarding the qualifications and experience that will be necessary."
The submission went on to question the need for legislation as a mechanism for closing the attainment gap.
Officials said the duty was "unnecessary" because it failed to take into account the ongoing commitment of authorities to tackle poor attainment under existing legislation.
The idea to enshrine a greater emphasis on closing the attainment gap in legislation was announced in February by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
By age five pupils from poorer backgrounds can be up to 13 months behind their peers in literacy and numeracy and by the age of 14 pupils from better-off areas are more than twice as likely to do well. Attainment at 16 has risen overall, but a significant and persistent gap remains.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article