Secondary teachers have warned councils that saving money by reducing the number of classroom assistants will damage the quality of education for all pupils.
The Scottish Secondary Teachers Association (SSTA) blamed a concordat between the Scottish Government and local authorities for the lack of protection afforded to support staff.
“It is time for the Government to act and insist that previous support standards, which are already very minimal in some schools, are retained,” said Ann Ballinger, general secretary of the SSTA.
However, Cosla, which represents local authorities, refuted the suggestions, saying the concordat made it more likely that children with special needs would get the support they needed.
The Classroom Assistant Initiative was launched by the former Scottish Executive as a pilot programme in 1998 and rolled out across the country over the following three years.
Classroom assistants were tasked with undertaking a range of administrative and support tasks such as photocopying, collecting dinner money or helping with arts and crafts preparation. Crucially, they also work one-to-one with pupils who may have learning difficulties or need support in literacy or numeracy.
This role became increasingly important with the introduction of so-called mainstreaming -- where children with additional support needs or behavioural difficulties are taught in mainstream classrooms rather than special schools.
But official figures published in November show the number of classroom assistants and behaviour support staff across Scotland has fallen from 5443 in 2008 to 5296 in 2009.
“It is only relatively recently that many of the young people involved lost their principal educational resource when their special school was closed under the guise of inclusion, which was no more than a cost saving exercise,” said Mrs Ballinger.
“Only a few years later, the same pupils face a further reduction as many local authorities, again for financial reasons, reduce or withdraw the level of their teaching auxiliary support.
“Not only do the pupils suffer the obvious deterioration in their education, but class teachers now inevitably spend more time with them. The consequence is, of course, a reduction in the amount of time spent with mainstream pupils.”
Mrs Ballinger added “Much of the cause is the so-called concordat between Government and local authorities which has already, in other areas, beenrecognised as a barrier to progress.”
However, Isabel Hutton, education spokeswoman for Cosla, backed the concordat.
“The irony of this accusation is that the local flexibility enabled by the concordat makes it more likely that individual children with special needs will receive support appropriate to their needs,” she said.
“The concordat doesn’t create barriers to progress -- it provides flexibility so that, when barriers do occur, councils and their community planning partners can identify the most appropriate ways to overcome them.
“While councils can’t afford to do everything they would like to, there won’t be a council in the land that doesn’t place upmost priority on improving the lives of children, particularly those with the greatest needs. To suggest otherwise is frankly nonsense.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said the 2004 Additional Support for Learning Act placed a duty on local authorities to meet the needs of all young people with additional support needs.
“It is a matter for each authority to determine how this provision is met across their school estate,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article