THE Scottish Government is under pressure to explain how it would plug a funding gap for higher education under independence.
Under the present system, students from other European Union states are entitled to free university education, while people from England, Wales and Northern Ireland can be charged fees of up to £9000 a year.
If Scotland became a new European state, people from the rest of the UK would fall under the same EU exemption – leaving a shortfall of cash for universities.
Ministers had originally suggested the funding gap would be £155 million, but new figures from the Scottish Parliament suggest it could be as much as £263m by 2014/15.
Liz Smith, education spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservative Party, said: "At a time when the overall competence of the Scottish Government has been seriously undermined, yet more questions have arisen about the size of the funding gap and the full cost of higher education.
"The Scottish Parliament Information Centre has estimated the Scottish Government has already underestimated the funding gap by more than £100m."
However, a Scottish Government spokesman said the claim was based on out-of-date figures and did not reflect the investment put into Scottish universities in the most recent spending reviews.
"Funding arrangements for EU students, which will include students from the rest of the UK post-Independence, are currently being considered and at this point predictions of what those arrangements might be or what number of students from the rest of the UK might apply to Scottish universities, are purely speculative," he said.
In a separate development, the Scottish Liberal Democrats are to reaffirm their support for free university tuition for Scottish students. NUS Scotland welcomed the move.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article