NEARLY half of teachers lack confidence in the delivery of flagship new Higher exams less than a year before their introduction, a new survey shows.
A poll of more than 1,300 teachers found 44 per cent said they were "not at all confident" the new Higher qualifications would be introduced successfully in 2015.
Teachers also questioned the support available to deliver the new Higher from national exam body the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), with only one per cent describing it as "excellent" and 65 per cent saying it was "poor".
The survey, by the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), also raised concerns about the way schools are dealing with rising workload faced by teachers.
The introduction of new National qualifications, which replaced Standard Grade this summer, led to significant extra workload, but 82 per cent of respondents said schools had taken no action to "lessen or control" the additional burden.
The survey results were published as officials from teaching unions and other key educational bodies gave evidence on the introduction of new qualifications to the Scottish Parliament's education committee.
The changes have been undertaken as part of the wider Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) reforms which seek to make education more relevant and better able to provide pupils with skills such as problem-solving and teamwork.
Unions representing secondary teachers told MSPs they were "extremely anxious" about the introduction of the new Highers because not enough support was available.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said: "An assessment of last year has to acknowledge that the workload burden that was faced by teachers in schools is simply unsustainable.
"We think in terms of moving forward we have to recognise ... an exceptional effort to deliver the qualifications, but it does need to be addressed. We seem to be getting a repeat of last year and we said this was unsustainable.
"The single biggest resource missing is time for teachers to actually assimilate material and have a professional dialogue around implementation."
Jane Peckham, Scotland organiser of the National Association of Schoolmasters and Union of Women Teachers, echoed Mr Flanagan's concerns.
She said: "I think teachers still feel extremely anxious about the next phase. It would be foolish to think we are over the worst."
And Richard Goring, for the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, told the committee many teachers were working up to 60 hours a weeks to keep up.
However, Terry Lanagan, from the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland, said the implementation of the National qualifications was always going to a "key pressure point".
He said: "I think it is to everyone's credit that the first set of National qualifications and the first exams went so smoothly.
"I am quite clear, with 37 years working in education, that there has been no initiative in Scottish education during that time where there has been more communication or more support."
Ken Muir, chief executive of the General Teaching Council for Scotland, added: "We are very much over the hump in terms of getting CfE into place."
Dr Janet Brown, chief executive of the SQA, said: "I think we have provided very good support. The challenge is to make sure people can access it."
The EIS survey featured replies from across Scotland although a greater number of responses came from Glasgow, South Lanarkshire, Aberdeen, Fife, the Highlands and Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article