UNIVERSITY lecturers across the UK are today beginning an assessment boycott in a row over changes to pensions.
Under the move by the UCU union, which represents academics and support staff, thousands of students will no longer receive marks or feedback for official assessments.
The row centres on the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), which provides pensions for staff at universities including Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, St Andrews and Stirling.
Universities UK wants to end the final-salary element of the scheme for all USS members and move them to a career average scheme in order to tackle a deficit.
However, the union argues the changes are too simplistic and do not take into account the strengths of the scheme.
UCU Scotland official Mary Senior urged universities not to dock full pay from staff, as some have been threatening to do. She also stressed some institutions had privately been sympathetic to the UCU cause.
"Docking 100 per cent of pay from staff who are continuing to perform the vast majority of their duties is completely unethical and risks causing greater damage to students' education," she said. "Punitive pay docking could lead to lectures and seminars being cancelled as members refuse to work for free."
A Universities UK spokesman previously expressed disappointment about the assessment boycott, saying: "We believe the proposals are the best that can be achieved given the substantial scheme deficit."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article