MINISTERS have been accused of putting a gun to the head of councils as it emerged that all but one local authority has signed up to a controversial deal to maintain teacher numbers.
The Scottish Government announced that 31 out of 32 local authorities have agreed in principle to protect the number of teachers they employ in return for additional funding. Discussions are under way with the one remaining council still to agree to the deal.
Education Secretary Angela Constance said the talks had been "positive and productive" but council umbrella body Cosla said local authorities had been left with "Hobson's Choice".
Councillor David O'Neill, Cosla president, accused the government of "bulldozing" through the scheme and then trying to "spin" it as a success.
He said: "We have seen the vast majority of these letters and it is fair to say that very few councils have signed up to their individual deal with a spring in their step and it is both wrong and totally misleading to present this in this manner.
"With a gun to your head, it is difficult to make the decisions you might otherwise want to make. Councils once again were left in the invidious position of having to accept this deal or face the most unpalatable of punitive measures.
He added: "This is not a local government scheme and had we devised it, it would not have looked like this. When this goes wrong the public should remember that."
The SNP has placed the retention of teachers at the heart of its education policy, but councils argue the number of teachers has no direct correlation to educational standards.
Ms Constance said local authorities were being goven £51 million, including an extra £10 above last year's settlement, specifically to support teacher numbers.
"Education in schools is getting better, with record exam results and record numbers of school leavers in work, education or training and this Government has made it our top priority to continue that improvement and to raise attainment for all of Scotland's children."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article