AS pupils who receive their exam results today experience a gamut of emotions from delight to despair, the over-riding feeling amongst ministers and exam officials is probably one of relief.
The introduction of the new National qualifications, which replaced Standard Grades and Intermediates this summer, ushered in one of the most difficult periods in Scottish education since the bitter fall-out from the 2000 exams crisis, when hundreds of pupils were sent the wrong results.
Confirmation from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) that, at 81.1%, the overall pass rate for National 5 is similar to the equivalent Intermediate 2 qualifications from last year will help diffuse the tension that has dogged their introduction.
It won't just be those at the SQA who will be breathing a little easier. In the year of the independence referendum the stakes could not have been higher for the SNP Government and its education ministers if the new qualifications had been seen to fail pupils.
But it's not quite time to pop open the champagne. Firstly, analysts will be looking closely at the boundaries between the different grades at National 5 to see whether the exams have performed as expected. More importantly, there is also the experience of pupils to take into consideration.
Like it or not, the pupils who sat the first year of the National 5 exams have taken part in an experimental and difficult year where teachers have complained of too much assessment, overwork and confusion about course content.
It still remains to be seen whether the quality of their experience will prepare them adequately for the challenges that lie ahead, such as Highers or the workplace.
There is also the issue of whether the wider aims of the Curriculum for Excellence school reforms to make learning broader and more relevant have been realised, with schools expending all their efforts to ensure the majority of candidates had a successful exam diet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article