ANOTHER disaster in Scottish education could be avoided by letting schools delay the introduction of controversial new exams, teachers' leaders have warned.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary elect of the Educational Institute of Scotland, said the exams fiasco of 2000 only affected a minority of pupils, but was a "catastrophe" for those involved.
And he argued that even if current problems with the roll-out of exams related to the new Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) resulted in poorer marks for a small percentage of pupils, it would still be a huge blow for the school system.
"When they had the Higher Still meltdown it was only a tiny percentage of pupils who actually suffered as a result of the confusion around the marking," he said.
"If only five per cent of pupils are disadvantaged by schools pushing ahead when they are not ready then that would be another catastrophe for Scottish education. If that can be avoided by a phased introduction for one year, I think we should take that opportunity."
Mr Flanagan was giving evidence to the Scottish Parliament's education committee, which is conducting an investigation into concerns over the introduction of CfE and its new exams, called National 4 and National 5.
The Scottish Government has insisted councils are progressing well with the programme and will be ready to deliver new exams in 2013/14.
However, East Renfrewshire Council and a number of leading private schools have delayed implementation for a year, arguing their schools need more time.
Mr Flanagan told the committee there were "serious concerns" from teachers and schools, with a "failure of communication" leading to uncertainty and worry over a lack of detail on the new exams.
John Wilson, director of education for East Renfrew-shire, told MSPs the council had done more than any other in Scotland to help develop CfE.
However, he said he had listened to the concerns of teachers and headteachers that it would be in the best interests of pupils to delay for a year.
Janet Brown, chief executive of the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), said the timetable was faster than normal, but it was "achievable".
Bill Maxwell, chief executive of Education Scotland, said a delay would cause a loss of momentum and practical difficulties.
He said: "We feel it is on schedule and would be doing a great disservice to pupils who are already following a CfE programme to pull the plug."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article