SCOTTISH universities need a radical overhaul of their admissions procedures to prevent discrimination against pupils, a new report warns.
The call follows the introduction of Scotland's new school curriculum which allows much greater flexibility over when pupils sit Higher exams.
Universities prefer pupils to sit five Highers required for entry in one year as it demonstrates their ability to cope with a tough workload. In some courses – such as medicine and law – it is a prerequisite.
But under the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) pupils will be allowed to sit Highers earlier or later to allow for different rates of progress – with some taking them over two years.
A report by Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, warns of a wide variation in how prepared universities are for the new curriculum.
The report states: "It is clear that individual universities are already taking action to develop responsive strategies to CfE by making admissions policies more flexible.
"However, there are wide variations among institutions in their levels of involvement, and the stages they have reached in formally planning for the future."
The report calls for a review of admissions policy within each institution to ensure they will be able to give "fair and equal consideration to candidates who have followed diverse routes to qualification".
The report highlights the planning difficulties faced by universities because of uncertainties with CfE. The report states: "Many schools are adopting approaches on an evolutionary year-by-year basis."
Ken Cunningham, general secretary of School Leaders Scotland, which represents secondary headteachers, said: "With this kind of commitment to collaboration and communication the future prospects of Scotland's young people as they move to future study should be assured."
Eileen Prior, executive director of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, added: "A more flexible schools system cannot create penalties for young people who want to go on to higher education."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article