STUDENTS have backed new legislation that gives more power to ministers over the way Scottish universities are run.
The National Union of Students (NUS) Scotland said the Post-16 Education (Scotland) Bill would make institutions more accountable and ensure they recruit greater numbers of students from poorer backgrounds.
The Bill, unveiled by Education Secretary Michael Russell, has come under fire from universities.
The legislation lets ministers set priorities for universities in return for public funding, such as ensuring institutions comply with new rules on governance and widening access.
It also gives the Scottish Funding Council, which administers public money on behalf of the Government, powers to review course provision.
A submission by NUS Scotland to the Scottish Parliament's education committee states: "As recipients of huge sums of public money it is important they are transparent and accountable to their staff, students, and wider communities."
On reviewing subjects, the submission states: "Over the past few years we have seen high-profile examples of institutions undertaking large-scale course closures and staff redundancies, often with little perceived academic benefit. We believe the power to review could be, and should be, used in situations such as these to protect the sector from negative reductions in provision."
However, UCU Scotland, which represents university lecturers, was more critical in its submission. The body welcomed the provisions to widen access and the inclusion of a legal requirement for universities to meet standards on governance.
But it added: "We have concerns over the legislative powers to review course provision as this opens up the possibility for a Government to directly influence courses and content.
"This opens up the possibility of political interference in the provision and content of courses, undermining the institutional autonomy of universities and the academic freedom of lecturers."
A Scottish Government spokesman said it was listening to all points of view.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article