A SCOTTISH university that undercut its rivals in setting fees for students from the rest of the UK has seen a dramatic rise in applications as other parts of the sector have reported a decline.
Glasgow University recorded an 11.4% increase in interest from students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland (RUK). This includes a 22% rise in the number of applications from England and a 37% increase in those applying from Wales.
In contrast, St Andrews University decided to go for the highest fees possible and registered a 5% reduction in applications from RUK students.
Official figures published earlier this month by Ucas, the universities admissions service, showed applications from RUK students to all Scottish universities dropped by 5% over the past year – from 24,979 to 23,689.
Although the overall figures are likely to improve once all applications have been processed – with some suggestions the final figure could represent a decline of 1.9% – any drop will be a concern to universities seeking to expand their numbers of RUK students to boost income.
The increase at Glasgow is significant because officials there decided to undercut rivals such as St Andrews and Edinburgh, which set the maximum fee of £36,000 for a four-year degree. Glasgow opted to charge a maximum of £26,000, also undercutting UK counterparts in the prestigious Russell Group of universities, which includes Oxford, Cambridge, Manchester, Birmingham and Newcastle, by £1000. It was hoped the move would help the university attract more RUK students by offering a Russell Group degree at a competitive cost.
Yesterday, a spokeswoman for Glasgow University said: "We are pleased our applications from the rest of the UK and internationally have all increased.
"This is a welcome vote of confidence from students regarding the quality of education and the wider student experience at Glasgow, one of Scotland's world-class universities."
A spokesman for St Andrews said: "We do not yet have final figures on application trends, but we anticipate a modest decrease in RUK applications of up to 5%. Overall, we expect applications to St Andrews to have grown by approximately 12%."
Edinburgh said it expected to see an increase in applications from RUK students, apart from those from Northern Ireland.
Graeme Kirkpatrick, depute president of NUS Scotland, said: "Given the astronomical fee level that it has set for students from the rest of the UK, St Andrews should be ashamed at the drop in applicants.
"We always said £36,000 was a ludicrous amount for anyone to pay for their education and it seems that students from the rest of UK agree, and are voting with their feet.
"Even the slightest bit of restraint from other universities in setting rest-of-UK fees seems to have reaped benefits in their applications figures."
Any fall in applications from RUK students has to be seen in the context of how many total applications universities receive from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Even with a fall of 5%, St Andrews is still attracting at least eight applications for every place and Edinburgh similarly attracts high numbers.
The focus on RUK students follows the decision by the Scottish Government to allow universities north of the Border to introduce fees of up to £9000 for RUK students. The new charges, which apply from this year, were introduced to raise additional revenue for universities, but there were fears the higher fees could deter students from coming.
Scottish higher education for Scottish students remains free, and the additional numbers of RUK students will not impact on places for home students because these are funded by the Scottish Government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article